|
|
 |
Medtronic Heart Lead
Recall Blog
|
 |
February 4th, 2010
“The hazard of [Sprint] Fidelis lead fracture is increasing exponentially with time and, based on our data, occurring at a higher rate than the latest manufacturer’s performance update,” doctors at the University of Rochester concluded in findings published in the January 2010 issue of the American Journal of Cardiology [abstract only]. The study found that the three-year survival rate of 426 Medtronic leads inserted in the hospital’s patients was 90.8%, meaning 9.2% failed. This follows a report from December 2009 which estimated the failure rate of the Sprint Fidelis lead may eventually reach 30% of all patients.
On February 4, 2010, the Wall Street Journal noted that the FDA database includes at least 12 additional deaths allegedly linked to the recalled device [login required].
Tags: Failure rates, Patient deaths, survival rates Posted in Failure reports, Patient deaths | 2 Comments »
September 25th, 2009
The New York Times reports that the Food and Drug Administration has revealed that four New Jersey congressmen and its own former commissioner unduly influenced the process that led to its decision last year to approve a patch for injured knees, an approval it is now revisiting. The agency’s scientific reviewers repeatedly and unanimously over many years decided that the device, known as Menaflex and manufactured by ReGen Biologics Inc., was unsafe because the device often failed, forcing patients to get another operation.
But after receiving what an FDA report described as “extreme,” “unusual” and persistent pressure from four Democrats from New Jersey — Senators Robert Menendez and Frank R. Lautenberg and Representatives Frank Pallone Jr. and Steven R. Rothman — agency managers overruled the scientists and approved the device for sale in December.
All four legislators made their inquiries within a few months of receiving significant campaign contributions from ReGen, which is based in New Jersey, but all said they had acted appropriately and were not influenced by the money. Dr. Andrew C. von Eschenbach, the former drug agency’s commissioner (who resigned amidst controversy in August 2009), said he had acted properly.
As noted in the wake of previous similar problems, this highlights the importance of passage of the Medical Device Safety Act, which would restore the right of patients injured by faulty medical devices to hold manufacturers accountable. The safety of millions of Americans with medical devices should not be put in the hands of one person at the FDA. The civil justice system provides an independent check and balance on corporations to ensure that their products are safe.
Tags: corruption, FDA, mdsa Posted in FDA | 1 Comment »
August 18th, 2009
After her daughter Katie died during surgery to remove a defective Medtronic heart defibrillator wire, Michele Meyer became an activist for patients rights. Meyer’s daughter and others had their rights taken away as a result of a 2008 Supreme Court decision that gave medical device manufacturers immunity from legal claims. Meyer is working hard to restore the right to sue negligent manufacturers of faulty medical devices. These families are pressing Congress to pass the Medical Device Safety Act.
Other families affected by the preemption ruling include the Bairds, whose 16 year old son died after his Medtronic Sigma pacemaker malfunctioned, and the Beadlings. Wife and mother Jan Beadling has been shocked several times and has been left with serious and permanent injuries as a result of a faulty Medtronic heart lead and currently has no legal recourse.
Earlier this month, Meyer joined the Bairds, Beadlings, and many others in Washington to attend a hearing before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee and give voice to their concerns about medical device safety.
Jan Beadling is impassioned about the cause. She stated, “This legislation is crucial to protecting patients. I’m concerned about the next person harmed by these dangerous products.”
Tags: HELP, Medical Device Safety Act, Medtronic heart lead, patient rights, Senate Posted in Legislation | No Comments »
August 13th, 2009
Two days ago, it was reported that Dr. Daniel Schultz resigned from his post as the head of the FDA’s medical devices division. Earlier this year, nine scientists wrote letters to President Obama and other political leaders alleging that there was “systemic corruption and wrongdoing that permeates all levels of FDA,” including within the medical device approval process, which put the safety of Americans at risk.
The scientists claimed that they were pressured to approve certain devices and threatened those that failed to do so with disciplinary action. In one glaring example, the scientists claim Dr. Schultz approved a Regan Biologics knee repair device in 2008, despite the scientists’ repeated rejections of the device because it posed “an increased risk” in comparison to similar devices.
In a January hearing, the Government Accountability Office criticized the FDA, saying the agency had not been inspecting the production of medical devices as regularly as it was required to. High-risk devices, such as pacemakers, should be inspected every two years but the agency had been inspecting high-risk products only every six years.
This development highlights the importance of passage of the Medical Device Safety Act, which would restore the right of patients injured by faulty medical devices to hold manufacturers accountable. The safety of millions of Americans with medical devices should not be put in the hands of one person at the FDA. The civil justice system provides an independent check and balance on corporations to ensure that their products are safe.
Tags: FDA, FDA safety, Government Accountability Office, Medical Device Safety Act Posted in Legislation | 1 Comment »
August 7th, 2009
On August 4th, a number of a families who have suffered as the result of malfunctioning medical equipment, gathered on Capitol Hill in support of the Medical Device Safety Act, a bill that would allow consumers to hold manufacturers accountable for defective products and, thereby, promote safer devices for all patients.
Molly DeGroh of McHenry, Illinois recounts the nine devastating jolts of electricity from a malfunctioning defibrillator and lead that shocked her daughter Avery. At the hospital, a chest X-ray showed a broken lead, which would’ve been nearly impossible for three-year old Avery to have broken.
Iowan Mike Mulvhill of Bettendorf shared a harrowing story of being shocked while driving through a construction zone in Ohio on a road trip to the East Coast. The defibrillator that had been implanted a little more than a year earlier for an irregular heart beat and pulse rate had shocked him with 22 unexpected, painful charges to his heart. After emergency surgery at Ohio State University, the trauma and effects of the ordeal have forced Mulvhill into early retirement.
Mike Collins of Georgetown, Texas who is afflicted with the heart condition hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, received six improper shocks from a defibrillator implanted in 2007. Collins thinks it’s important that this bill is passed: “There is a major injustice in the situation. The companies need to be held responsible for what they do.”
Tags: defibrillator, mdsa, Medical Device Safety Act, senate hearing, victim rights Posted in Legislation | No Comments »
August 5th, 2009
 Aug. 4, 2009 Senate Hearing on the MDSA
Two years ago, Michael Mulvihill of Bettendorf, Iowa, was driving when he saw a blue light flash before his eyes. His heart defibrillator was malfunctioning and sending electrical shocks throughout his body. Mulvihill’s nightmare continues because he cannot hold the manufacturer of his faulty medical device accountable due to a U.S. Supreme Court decision that gave device manufacturers complete immunity.
On August 4, 2009, Mulvihill, a client of Lieff Cabraser, testified before a U.S. Senate Committee, asking for Congress to pass the Medical Device Safety Act (MDSA), legislation that would restore the right of patients to hold manufacturers of defective medical devices accountable.
View video of the August 4, 2009 Senate hearing on the MDSA.
Tags: congress, mdsa Posted in Legislation | No Comments »
July 30th, 2009
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions is scheduled to hold a hearing on “Protecting Patients from Defective Medical Devices” as part of its review of the proposed Medical Device Safety Act of 2009. The hearing will occur on Tuesday, Aug. 4th at 2:30 p.m. The committee has broad jurisdiction over the operation of the country’s health care, schools, employment and retirement programs.
Tags: HELP, Medical Device Safety Act, Senate, senate hearing Posted in Legislation | No Comments »
July 17th, 2009
In an OpEd News article titled “Restoring Patient Rights and Promoting Safer Medical Devices,” Lieff Cabraser attorney Stephen H. Cassidy discusses the critical importance of the Medical Safety Device Act of 2009 for patients.
Avery DeGroh is one of thousands in America who suffered terrifying electrical shocks caused by a faulty Medtronic lead. Sadly, they have been deprived of their legal right to hold Medtronic accountable for its negligence. The Medical Device Safety Act of 2009 (S. 540/ H.R. 1346), restores the right of Americans injured by medical devices, to seek justice through the civil justice system. Read the full article on OpEd News.
Tags: defibrillator, Legislation, Medical Device Safety Act, Medtronic heart lead, patient rights, victim rights Posted in Legislation | No Comments »
April 2nd, 2009
On March 31st, 2009, Medical Device Patients from around the country traveled to Washington, DC to appear before Congress and ask legislators to pass the Medical Device Safety Act. Over a year before, the February 2008 decision in Riegel v. Medtronic ignored Congressional intent and disregarded 30 years of experience under the 1976 Medical Device Amendments (MDA), during which FDA regulation and state tort law worked together to protect consumers from dangerous devices. The Riegel decision gave total immunity to device manufacturers who fail to adequately warn consumers about device risks. In Riegel, the device that failed was a Medtronic balloon catheter used in heart surgery. Riegel needed additional surgery but eventually died. Now, thanks to the decision, Riegel’s heirs are left holding the bag for the manufacturer’s negligence.
Tags: Medtronic heart lead Posted in Legislation | No Comments »
March 17th, 2009
On March 15, 2009, the New York Times ran an editorial supporting the idea that patients victimized by defective medical devices should have their rights to sue manufacturers restored. These historical rights were invalidated last year when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that device makers could not be sued for damages in state courts if the device was approved by the F.D.A. As the Times put it,
“Now that the Supreme Court has ruled that patients can sue drug companies in state courts for harm caused by medicines approved by the Food and Drug Administration, Congress ought to give patients the same right to sue makers of medical devices.”
The editorial concluded that suits in state courts should reinforce federal regulations, and that patients hurt by faulty medical devices should have the right to seek redress there. Read a copy of the full editorial.
Tags: Medical Device Safety Act, victim rights Posted in Legislation | No Comments »
|
|
|
|
About Lieff Cabraser |
Founded in 1972, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP is an over sixty attorney law firm with offices in San
Francisco, New York and Nashville. For the last seven years,
the National Law Journal has recognized Lieff Cabraser
as one of the top plaintiff law firms in America. |
To learn more about the advantages our lawyers
offer clients in personal injury and wrongful death cases, click
here. |
Copyright © 2010 Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP |
Firm
Profile | Attorneys | Offices | Contact | Attorney
Advertising Disclaimer | Privacy | Sitemap |
|
TRADEMARK NOTICE: "Medtronic" is
a trademark of Medtronic, Inc. Lieff Cabraser
is in no way affiliated with Medtronic, Inc. The use of this
mark is solely for informational and product identification purposes. |
|