banner - top
banner - middle
 
banner-bottom
Image: place holder
Image: stethoscope

Medtronic Heart Lead
Recall Blog

Place holder

Posts Tagged ‘FDA’

Studies Show Need for Medical Monitoring

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

The Huffington Post reports on the recent release of studies by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and the American Journal of Therapeutics, which show “how the FDA lacks stringent scientific standards to evaluate cardiovascular medical devices. This underscores the need to pass the Medical Device Safety Act (MDSA).” The MDSA aims to allow hundreds of thousands injured by faulty medical devices to hold the manufacturers accountable for their defective products and end the policy of preemption of consumer lawsuits.

The study by JAMA showed that premarket approval of several kinds of cardiovascular devices was based on small studies, with significantly less scrutiny than that needed to approve pharmaceutical drugs.  The American Journal of Therapeutics found that about 40 percent of the heart studies examined lacked specific safety targets and failed to follow patients over the long-term.

Read the full article on the Huffington Post website.

FDA Reveals It Fell to a Push by Lawmakers

Friday, September 25th, 2009

The New York Times reports that the Food and Drug Administration has revealed that four New Jersey congressmen and its own former commissioner unduly influenced the process that led to its decision last year to approve a patch for injured knees, an approval it is now revisiting. The agency’s scientific reviewers repeatedly and unanimously over many years decided that the device, known as Menaflex and manufactured by ReGen Biologics Inc., was unsafe because the device often failed, forcing patients to get another operation.

But after receiving what an FDA report described as “extreme,” “unusual” and persistent pressure from four Democrats from New Jersey — Senators Robert Menendez and Frank R. Lautenberg and Representatives Frank Pallone Jr. and Steven R. Rothman — agency managers overruled the scientists and approved the device for sale in December.

All four legislators made their inquiries within a few months of receiving significant campaign contributions from ReGen, which is based in New Jersey, but all said they had acted appropriately and were not influenced by the money. Dr. Andrew C. von Eschenbach, the former drug agency’s commissioner (who resigned amidst controversy in August 2009), said he had acted properly.

As noted in the wake of previous similar problems, this highlights the importance of passage of the Medical Device Safety Act, which would restore the right of patients injured by faulty medical devices to hold manufacturers accountable.  The safety of millions of Americans with medical devices should not be put in the hands of one person at the FDA. The civil justice system provides an independent check and balance on corporations to ensure that their products are safe.

FDA Head of Medical Devices Resigns; Controversy Highlights Need for Passage of Medical Device Safety Act

Thursday, August 13th, 2009

Two days ago, it was reported that Dr. Daniel Schultz resigned from his post as the head of the FDA’s medical devices division. Earlier this year,  nine scientists wrote letters to President Obama and other political leaders alleging that there was “systemic corruption and wrongdoing that permeates all levels of FDA,” including within the medical device approval process, which put the safety of Americans at risk.

The scientists claimed that they were pressured to approve certain devices and threatened those that failed to do so with disciplinary action.  In one glaring example, the scientists claim Dr. Schultz approved a Regan Biologics knee repair device in 2008, despite the scientists’ repeated rejections of the device because it posed “an increased risk” in comparison to similar devices.

In a January hearing, the Government Accountability Office criticized the FDA, saying the agency had not been inspecting the production of medical devices as regularly as it was required to. High-risk devices, such as pacemakers, should be inspected every two years but the agency had been inspecting high-risk products only every six years.

This development highlights the importance of passage of the Medical Device Safety Act, which would restore the right of patients injured by faulty medical devices to hold manufacturers accountable.  The safety of millions of Americans with medical devices should not be put in the hands of one person at the FDA.  The civil justice system provides an independent check and balance on corporations to ensure that their products are safe.

Firm Logo

About Lieff Cabraser

Founded in 1972, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is an over sixty attorney law firm with offices in San Francisco, New York and Nashville. We represent clients in defective medical device personal injury lawsuits and other cases.



Copyright © 2013 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP        

TRADEMARK NOTICE: "Medtronic" is a trademark of Medtronic, Inc. Lieff Cabraser is in no way affiliated with Medtronic, Inc. The use of this mark is solely for informational and product identification purposes.